The mission of A.E. Burdick School is focused on creating well-rounded students that will be successful in their community. They focus on major subjects and relate them to how they will apply to real life situations.
Burdick’s is committed to a set of goals such as being a school that is well connected to their students, parents, teachers, and neighboring community. This will help them achieve the excellence they strive for at Burdick.
The mission of the Whitefish Bay Middle school is focused on creating a place where these young people can change and grow. They focus a lot on relationships, emotions, and physical needs of their students. Because this is a huge part of teenage growth in multiple areas, the school has to realize all these needs to be meet.
Whitefish Bay Middle school’s goals are to help students learn how to learn. Using multiple facets of learning, the all student’s needs are meet. They receive several hands-on opportunities and chances to learn by relating concepts to their lives.
Demographics of the community
Burdick Elementary is located in the Milwaukee Public School district. Most of the Milwaukee area would be labeled an urban setting. Milwaukee is a major city in Wisconsin. The total population in 2010 was
Whitefish Bay Middle School is located in Whitefish Bay school district. Whitefish Bay is considered a village. This village would be labeled a suburban setting. The total population in 2010 was 14, 110 (according to the U.S. Census Bureau). There are a total of 4 schools in this district. There is one high school, one middle school, and two elementary schools. (according to the U.S. Census Bureau). There are a total of 214 public schools in the Milwaukee Public Schools district.
Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity
At Burdick, there is a high average of white students. However, Hispanic, black, Asian, American Indian, and Pacific Isle are represented in a small percentage.
(See Figure 1)
At Whitefish Bay, almost 80% is white. However, Hispanic, black, Asian, American Indian, and Pacific Isle is represented in a much smaller percentage.
(See Figure 2)
Student Performance on WKCE by Race/Ethnicity
At Burdick, the average score was between 33% - 66% across race and ethnicity. The lowest score in proficient was by a combined group (small number) in 4th grade. The highest score in proficient was by a Hispanic group in 6th grade.
(See Table 1)
At Whitefish Bay, the average score was between 6% - 54% across race and ethnicity. The lowest score in proficient was by a combined group (small number) in 7th grade. The highest score in proficient was by a black not Hispanic group in 6th grade.
(See Table 2)
Student Performance on WKCE by Disability
At Burdick, students with disabilities scored between 30%-60%. Students without disabilities scored between 30%-50%. The scores of each group are consistent throughout grade levels.
(See Table 3)
At Whitefish Bay, students with disabilities scored between 18%-60%. Students without disabilities scored between10%- 26%. Students without disabilities scored higher in the advanced category, which should be taken into account.
(See Table 4)
Student Performance on WKCE by English Proficiency
At Burdick, the scores of English proficient students was 50% in proficient. There was insufficient data collected for limited English proficient students.
(See Table 5)
At Whitefish Bay, the scores of English proficient students were not documented. There is not enough data to provide sufficient feedback.
(See Table 6)
WSAS - All Tested Grades - Reading
All Levels
WKCE and WAA Combined by Race/Ethnicity
Burdick El FAY
November 2010 Data
Summary - All School Types Combined
Enrolled at Test Time
No WSAS Total
Min Perf
Basic
Proficient
Advanced
Milwaukee / Burdick El
Grade 3
American Indian or Alaska Native
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Asian or Pacific Islander
1
*
*
*
*
*
Black Not Hispanic
5
*
*
*
*
*
Hispanic
12
0.0%
0.0%
41.7%
50.0%
8.3%
White Not Hispanic
30
0.0%
0.0%
6.7%
43.3%
50.0%
Race/Eth Code Missing
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Combined Groups (Small Number)
6
0.0%
0.0%
16.7%
50.0%
33.3%
Grade 4
American Indian or Alaska Native
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Asian or Pacific Islander
2
*
*
*
*
*
Black Not Hispanic
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Hispanic
10
*
*
*
*
*
White Not Hispanic
23
0.0%
0.0%
21.7%
52.2%
26.1%
Race/Eth Code Missing
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Combined Groups (Small Number)
12
0.0%
16.7%
41.7%
33.3%
8.3%
Grade 5
American Indian or Alaska Native
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Asian or Pacific Islander
3
*
*
*
*
*
Black Not Hispanic
4
*
*
*
*
*
Hispanic
9
0.0%
0.0%
33.3%
44.4%
22.2%
White Not Hispanic
30
0.0%
3.3%
16.7%
43.3%
36.7%
Race/Eth Code Missing
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Combined Groups (Small Number)
7
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
57.1%
42.9%
Grade 6
American Indian or Alaska Native
1
*
*
*
*
*
Asian or Pacific Islander
2
*
*
*
*
*
Black Not Hispanic
3
*
*
*
*
*
Hispanic
6
0.0%
0.0%
16.7%
66.7%
16.7%
White Not Hispanic
35
0.0%
5.7%
8.6%
51.4%
34.3%
Race/Eth Code Missing
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Combined Groups (Small Number)
6
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
50.0%
50.0%
Grade 7
American Indian or Alaska Native
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Asian or Pacific Islander
3
*
*
*
*
*
Black Not Hispanic
5
*
*
*
*
*
Hispanic
12
0.0%
16.7%
8.3%
58.3%
16.7%
White Not Hispanic
47
0.0%
2.1%
2.1%
40.4%
55.3%
Race/Eth Code Missing
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Combined Groups (Small Number)
8
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
62.5%
37.5%
Grade 8
American Indian or Alaska Native
1
*
*
*
*
*
Asian or Pacific Islander
2
*
*
*
*
*
Black Not Hispanic
5
*
*
*
*
*
Hispanic
6
0.0%
16.7%
0.0%
50.0%
33.3%
White Not Hispanic
34
0.0%
5.9%
2.9%
38.2%
52.9%
Race/Eth Code Missing
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Combined Groups (Small Number)
8
0.0%
0.0%
25.0%
37.5%
37.5%
Table 1
WSAS - All Tested Grades - Reading
All Levels
WKCE and WAA Combined by Race/Ethnicity
Whitefish Bay Mid FAY
November 2010 Data
Summary - All School Types Combined
Enrolled at Test Time
No WSAS Total
Min Perf
Basic
Proficient
Advanced
Whitefish Bay / Whitefish Bay Mid
Grade 6
American Indian or Alaska Native
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Asian or Pacific Islander
21
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
14.3%
85.7%
Black Not Hispanic
24
0.0%
8.3%
4.2%
54.2%
33.3%
Hispanic
7
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
42.9%
57.1%
White Not Hispanic
141
0.0%
0.7%
0.7%
14.9%
83.7%
Race/Eth Code Missing
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Combined Groups (Small Number)
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Grade 7
American Indian or Alaska Native
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Asian or Pacific Islander
12
*
*
*
*
*
Black Not Hispanic
17
0.0%
5.9%
11.8%
41.2%
41.2%
Hispanic
4
*
*
*
*
*
White Not Hispanic
167
0.6%
0.6%
1.8%
12.0%
85.0%
Race/Eth Code Missing
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Combined Groups (Small Number)
16
0.0%
0.0%
6.3%
6.3%
87.5%
Grade 8
American Indian or Alaska Native
1
*
*
*
*
*
Asian or Pacific Islander
14
0.0%
0.0%
7.1%
35.7%
57.1%
Black Not Hispanic
32
0.0%
0.0%
12.5%
40.6%
46.9%
Hispanic
8
*
*
*
*
*
White Not Hispanic
155
0.6%
2.6%
2.6%
22.6%
71.6%
Race/Eth Code Missing
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Combined Groups (Small Number)
9
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
22.2%
77.8%
Table 2
WSAS - All Tested Grades - Reading
All Levels
WKCE and WAA Combined by Disability
Burdick El FAY
November 2010 Data
Summary - All School Types Combined
Enrolled at Test Time
No WSAS Total
Min Perf
Basic
Proficient
Advanced
Milwaukee / Burdick El
Grade 3
Students with Disabilities
5
*
*
*
*
*
Students w/o Disabilities
43
*
*
*
*
*
Grade 4
Students with Disabilities
6
0.0%
16.7%
50.0%
33.3%
0.0%
Students w/o Disabilities
29
0.0%
3.4%
24.1%
48.3%
24.1%
Grade 5
Students with Disabilities
5
*
*
*
*
*
Students w/o Disabilities
41
*
*
*
*
*
Grade 6
Students with Disabilities
5
*
*
*
*
*
Students w/o Disabilities
42
*
*
*
*
*
Grade 7
Students with Disabilities
10
0.0%
30.0%
20.0%
30.0%
20.0%
Students w/o Disabilities
57
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
49.1%
50.9%
Grade 8
Students with Disabilities
10
0.0%
30.0%
10.0%
60.0%
0.0%
Students w/o Disabilities
38
0.0%
0.0%
5.3%
34.2%
60.5%
Table 3
WSAS - All Tested Grades - Reading
All Levels
WKCE and WAA Combined by Disability
Whitefish Bay Mid FAY
November 2010 Data
Summary - All School Types Combined
Enrolled at Test Time
No WSAS Total
Min Perf
Basic
Proficient
Advanced
Whitefish Bay / Whitefish Bay Mid
Grade 6
Students with Disabilities
15
0.0%
20.0%
6.7%
60.0%
13.3%
Students w/o Disabilities
178
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
17.4%
82.0%
Grade 7
Students with Disabilities
18
0.0%
5.6%
27.8%
50.0%
16.7%
Students w/o Disabilities
182
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
10.4%
87.9%
Grade 8
Students with Disabilities
11
0.0%
36.4%
27.3%
18.2%
18.2%
Students w/o Disabilities
199
0.5%
0.0%
3.0%
26.6%
69.8%
Table 4
WSAS - All Tested Grades - Reading
All Levels
WKCE and WAA Combined by English Proficiency
Burdick El FAY
November 2010 Data
Summary - All School Types Combined
Enrolled at Test Time
No WSAS Total
Min Perf
Basic
Proficient
Advanced
Milwaukee / Burdick El
Grade 3
Limited English Proficient
1
*
*
*
*
*
English Proficient
47
*
*
*
*
*
Grade 4
Limited English Proficient
1
*
*
*
*
*
English Proficient
34
*
*
*
*
*
Grade 5
Limited English Proficient
1
*
*
*
*
*
English Proficient
45
*
*
*
*
*
Grade 6
Limited English Proficient
0
NA
*
*
*
*
English Proficient
47
0.0%
4.3%
8.5%
53.2%
34.0%
Grade 7
Limited English Proficient
1
*
*
*
*
*
English Proficient
66
*
*
*
*
*
Grade 8
Limited English Proficient
2
*
*
*
*
*
English Proficient
46
*
*
*
*
Table 5
WSAS - All Tested Grades - Reading
All Levels
WKCE and WAA Combined by English Proficiency
Whitefish Bay Mid FAY
November 2010 Data
Summary - All School Types Combined
Enrolled at Test Time
No WSAS Total
Min Perf
Basic
Proficient
Advanced
Whitefish Bay / Whitefish Bay Mid
Grade 6
Limited English Proficient
3
*
*
*
*
*
English Proficient
190
*
*
*
*
*
Grade 7
Limited English Proficient
1
*
*
*
*
*
English Proficient
199
*
*
*
*
*
Grade 8
Limited English Proficient
4
*
*
*
*
*
English Proficient
206
*
*
*
*
*
Table 6
Phase 2
The demographic of students is different in every school. One area in which students differ from each other is family, students, and teacher relationships, students and teacher relationships. This can impact a school in several ways within the classroom. At Whitefish Bay Middle School the special education teacher made a comment that there are differences in race, religion, family dynamic, and socioeconomic status. The special education teacher also made an interesting point that she can’t assume anything. For example, she can’t assume that Billy will have a computer at home, just like Amy. It’s important for the teachers to get to know the students at the beginning of the year so that the teachers can be respectful to the students, family, and their beliefs. The speech pathologist at the school commented on the demographic of the school as well. The special education teacher also stated that the differences between family supports could have a disadvantage on students if the parents don’t know how to support the students at home with homework.
Assuming that all students’ family lifestyles are the same is not something that the speech pathologist or special education teacher does at Whitefish Bay Middle School. The special education teacher states, that each family dynamic is different, and adding a student with a disability can change the dynamic completely. They have learned not to generalize and approach every situation differently. Another form of knowledge gained from the students’ families is always keeping an open mind and being flexible. Each family needs different things, and when working with their child you have to make sure that you and the parent are on the same page. For example, if the student is not performing a certain behavior, the teacher needs to contact and discuss with the parents the next plan of actions. Most times, teachers won’t inform students parents until the end of the semester or when the students is kicked out of the school. At Whitefish Bay Middle School, they make sure that the parent-teacher relationship is strong and full of communication.
Students all achieve at different levels, but does gender, race, or ethnicity have anything to do with where they fall? The special education teacher made it clear that she works with lower academic performing students; she has all different types of students, but she maintains a high level of expectations from her students. The speech pathologist makes a note that some parents can afford for their children to do extra therapy sessions, classes, and experiences. For the students who don’t have this option, she makes a point to complete as much as possible during the time she has with them. In essence, I don’t believe race, gender, or ethnicity have anything to do with how students achieve in the class. It’s all about resources.
When it comes to background in cultural awareness, the programs at Whitefish Bay Middle School are fairly new. The special education teacher notes that the school has implanted workshops, seminars, and reading for teachers to become more culturally competent. The school also has to complete activities to enhance cultural awareness. In a school where the demographic is similar, it’s important for this school to reach beyond what they see and learn more from the world resources.
When it comes to 21st century learning, Whitefish Bay Middle School is established in technology. The classes are filled with technology; from SMART boards, Netbooks for each student, technology classes, Skype, teacher webpages, and students listening to their iPods while they work is just naming a few. In the special education rooms, students are using iPads and other assistive technology to communicate. Technology is available throughout the school in multiple facets. It is very important in today’s school to have these resources available. Students go home to their computers, iPods, televisions, and so much more. Schools need to be just as stimulating if not more.
Outreach services are available for the special education students if it is included in their IEP. Students can receive therapy, tutors, transportation, homebound teaching, and online lessons. However, because this is only the perspective from the special education teacher and speech pathologist, this doesn’t mean that regular education students don’t receive outreach services as well.
Culturally competence is imperative in a diverse school. In a day and age where bullies and “cliques” are becoming the norm, having the awareness that everyone is different is important. The special education teacher made an interesting point about Whitefish Bay Middle School. In essence, she implied that the school has not always been culturally competent, but it has grown since her six years at the school. She has witnessed the students’ ability to appreciate each other’s difference and truly accept each other.
Overall, Whitefish Bay Middle School addresses the cultural needs of all its students. They strive to be current and up to date with their teaching styles, technology, and resources for their students. When observers walk through the halls of the school, you can feel a sense of higher standard. The students are accepted to act and behave in a certain manner. Students at this school are given many opportunities to succeed in education. The way every student SHOULD be given.
Phase 3
Whitefish Bay Middle School is located in the Whitefish Bay district. This district is predominately Caucasian and upper middle class. This is a large contributor in the cultural proficiency, the achievement gap, and the parent involvement within the school. The state proficiency test results do not show enough information on the majority of the school ethnicity. However, it did reveal that students with Hispanic, African American, and Asian background placed above 50% in all grades tested.
In regards to the achievement gap, the gap is very low. There is about 50% or more students placing in the advanced or proficient level on the WKCE. However, this is just one look at the achievement in Whitefish Bay Middle School. The interviews conducted with the special education teacher and the speech pathologist confirmed a different outlook on the achievement gap. The special education teacher noted in a personal conversation that students coming in from the elementary schools struggle more than any other students involved in special education. The students are coming from an environment where the teachers and special education teachers wanted them to succeed. Which that they ended up hindering there learning. They always received second chances and more time on tests. Well, because of this, many students stopped studying for the test, knowing that they would get a second chance at it. In middle school, however this is not the case. Teachers are much stricter on how test are handled. Although the students IEP’s are being meet, the students cannot always bank on the “second chance theory.” The gap is not very large at this school, but there is evidence of a small one when it comes to the special education classroom.
Parents take their children’s education very seriously. Parents at Whitefish Bay Middle School are hands on and very involved. In an observation, I was able to witness parents drive students around to various locations to meet with a community contact on information the students were researching. The parents are also contacting teachers regularly. The special education teacher commented that she will have parents email here up to three times a week inquiring on their child’s behavior or education. Although, this is not the case for every parent or guardian, it is true for a majority of the school. You can sense the feeling of community and unity with a strong parent presence. This is important for the success of the student’s education.
School Profile/Achievement Data Assignment
Phase 1
Field 2 (Burdick Elementary)
Field 3 (Whitefish Bay Middle)
Mission and goals of the school
The mission of A.E. Burdick School is focused on creating well-rounded students that will be successful in their community. They focus on major subjects and relate them to how they will apply to real life situations.
Burdick’s is committed to a set of goals such as being a school that is well connected to their students, parents, teachers, and neighboring community. This will help them achieve the excellence they strive for at Burdick.
The mission of the Whitefish Bay Middle school is focused on creating a place where these young people can change and grow. They focus a lot on relationships, emotions, and physical needs of their students. Because this is a huge part of teenage growth in multiple areas, the school has to realize all these needs to be meet.
Whitefish Bay Middle school’s goals are to help students learn how to learn. Using multiple facets of learning, the all student’s needs are meet. They receive several hands-on opportunities and chances to learn by relating concepts to their lives.
Demographics of the community
Burdick Elementary is located in the Milwaukee Public School district. Most of the Milwaukee area would be labeled an urban setting. Milwaukee is a major city in Wisconsin. The total population in 2010 was
Whitefish Bay Middle School is located in Whitefish Bay school district. Whitefish Bay is considered a village. This village would be labeled a suburban setting. The total population in 2010 was 14, 110 (according to the U.S. Census Bureau). There are a total of 4 schools in this district. There is one high school, one middle school, and two elementary schools. (according to the U.S. Census Bureau). There are a total of 214 public schools in the Milwaukee Public Schools district.
Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity
At Burdick, there is a high average of white students. However, Hispanic, black, Asian, American Indian, and Pacific Isle are represented in a small percentage.
(See Figure 1)
At Whitefish Bay, almost 80% is white. However, Hispanic, black, Asian, American Indian, and Pacific Isle is represented in a much smaller percentage.
(See Figure 2)
Student Performance on WKCE by Race/Ethnicity
At Burdick, the average score was between 33% - 66% across race and ethnicity. The lowest score in proficient was by a combined group (small number) in 4th grade. The highest score in proficient was by a Hispanic group in 6th grade.
(See Table 1)
At Whitefish Bay, the average score was between 6% - 54% across race and ethnicity. The lowest score in proficient was by a combined group (small number) in 7th grade. The highest score in proficient was by a black not Hispanic group in 6th grade.
(See Table 2)
Student Performance on WKCE by Disability
At Burdick, students with disabilities scored between 30%-60%. Students without disabilities scored between 30%-50%. The scores of each group are consistent throughout grade levels.
(See Table 3)
At Whitefish Bay, students with disabilities scored between 18%-60%. Students without disabilities scored between10%- 26%. Students without disabilities scored higher in the advanced category, which should be taken into account.
(See Table 4)
Student Performance on WKCE by English Proficiency
At Burdick, the scores of English proficient students was 50% in proficient. There was insufficient data collected for limited English proficient students.
(See Table 5)
At Whitefish Bay, the scores of English proficient students were not documented. There is not enough data to provide sufficient feedback.
(See Table 6)
WSAS - All Tested Grades - Reading
All Levels
WKCE and WAA Combined by Race/Ethnicity
Burdick El FAY
November 2010 Data
Summary - All School Types Combined
Enrolled at Test Time
No WSAS Total
Min Perf
Basic
Proficient
Advanced
Milwaukee / Burdick El
Grade 3
American Indian or Alaska Native
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Asian or Pacific Islander
1
*
*
*
*
*
Black Not Hispanic
5
*
*
*
*
*
Hispanic
12
0.0%
0.0%
41.7%
50.0%
8.3%
White Not Hispanic
30
0.0%
0.0%
6.7%
43.3%
50.0%
Race/Eth Code Missing
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Combined Groups (Small Number)
6
0.0%
0.0%
16.7%
50.0%
33.3%
Grade 4
American Indian or Alaska Native
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Asian or Pacific Islander
2
*
*
*
*
*
Black Not Hispanic
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Hispanic
10
*
*
*
*
*
White Not Hispanic
23
0.0%
0.0%
21.7%
52.2%
26.1%
Race/Eth Code Missing
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Combined Groups (Small Number)
12
0.0%
16.7%
41.7%
33.3%
8.3%
Grade 5
American Indian or Alaska Native
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Asian or Pacific Islander
3
*
*
*
*
*
Black Not Hispanic
4
*
*
*
*
*
Hispanic
9
0.0%
0.0%
33.3%
44.4%
22.2%
White Not Hispanic
30
0.0%
3.3%
16.7%
43.3%
36.7%
Race/Eth Code Missing
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Combined Groups (Small Number)
7
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
57.1%
42.9%
Grade 6
American Indian or Alaska Native
1
*
*
*
*
*
Asian or Pacific Islander
2
*
*
*
*
*
Black Not Hispanic
3
*
*
*
*
*
Hispanic
6
0.0%
0.0%
16.7%
66.7%
16.7%
White Not Hispanic
35
0.0%
5.7%
8.6%
51.4%
34.3%
Race/Eth Code Missing
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Combined Groups (Small Number)
6
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
50.0%
50.0%
Grade 7
American Indian or Alaska Native
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Asian or Pacific Islander
3
*
*
*
*
*
Black Not Hispanic
5
*
*
*
*
*
Hispanic
12
0.0%
16.7%
8.3%
58.3%
16.7%
White Not Hispanic
47
0.0%
2.1%
2.1%
40.4%
55.3%
Race/Eth Code Missing
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Combined Groups (Small Number)
8
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
62.5%
37.5%
Grade 8
American Indian or Alaska Native
1
*
*
*
*
*
Asian or Pacific Islander
2
*
*
*
*
*
Black Not Hispanic
5
*
*
*
*
*
Hispanic
6
0.0%
16.7%
0.0%
50.0%
33.3%
White Not Hispanic
34
0.0%
5.9%
2.9%
38.2%
52.9%
Race/Eth Code Missing
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Combined Groups (Small Number)
8
0.0%
0.0%
25.0%
37.5%
37.5%
Table 1
WSAS - All Tested Grades - Reading
All Levels
WKCE and WAA Combined by Race/Ethnicity
Whitefish Bay Mid FAY
November 2010 Data
Summary - All School Types Combined
Enrolled at Test Time
No WSAS Total
Min Perf
Basic
Proficient
Advanced
Whitefish Bay / Whitefish Bay Mid
Grade 6
American Indian or Alaska Native
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Asian or Pacific Islander
21
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
14.3%
85.7%
Black Not Hispanic
24
0.0%
8.3%
4.2%
54.2%
33.3%
Hispanic
7
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
42.9%
57.1%
White Not Hispanic
141
0.0%
0.7%
0.7%
14.9%
83.7%
Race/Eth Code Missing
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Combined Groups (Small Number)
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Grade 7
American Indian or Alaska Native
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Asian or Pacific Islander
12
*
*
*
*
*
Black Not Hispanic
17
0.0%
5.9%
11.8%
41.2%
41.2%
Hispanic
4
*
*
*
*
*
White Not Hispanic
167
0.6%
0.6%
1.8%
12.0%
85.0%
Race/Eth Code Missing
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Combined Groups (Small Number)
16
0.0%
0.0%
6.3%
6.3%
87.5%
Grade 8
American Indian or Alaska Native
1
*
*
*
*
*
Asian or Pacific Islander
14
0.0%
0.0%
7.1%
35.7%
57.1%
Black Not Hispanic
32
0.0%
0.0%
12.5%
40.6%
46.9%
Hispanic
8
*
*
*
*
*
White Not Hispanic
155
0.6%
2.6%
2.6%
22.6%
71.6%
Race/Eth Code Missing
0
NA
*
*
*
*
Combined Groups (Small Number)
9
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
22.2%
77.8%
Table 2
WSAS - All Tested Grades - Reading
All Levels
WKCE and WAA Combined by Disability
Burdick El FAY
November 2010 Data
Summary - All School Types Combined
Enrolled at Test Time
No WSAS Total
Min Perf
Basic
Proficient
Advanced
Milwaukee / Burdick El
Grade 3
Students with Disabilities
5
*
*
*
*
*
Students w/o Disabilities
43
*
*
*
*
*
Grade 4
Students with Disabilities
6
0.0%
16.7%
50.0%
33.3%
0.0%
Students w/o Disabilities
29
0.0%
3.4%
24.1%
48.3%
24.1%
Grade 5
Students with Disabilities
5
*
*
*
*
*
Students w/o Disabilities
41
*
*
*
*
*
Grade 6
Students with Disabilities
5
*
*
*
*
*
Students w/o Disabilities
42
*
*
*
*
*
Grade 7
Students with Disabilities
10
0.0%
30.0%
20.0%
30.0%
20.0%
Students w/o Disabilities
57
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
49.1%
50.9%
Grade 8
Students with Disabilities
10
0.0%
30.0%
10.0%
60.0%
0.0%
Students w/o Disabilities
38
0.0%
0.0%
5.3%
34.2%
60.5%
Table 3
WSAS - All Tested Grades - Reading
All Levels
WKCE and WAA Combined by Disability
Whitefish Bay Mid FAY
November 2010 Data
Summary - All School Types Combined
Enrolled at Test Time
No WSAS Total
Min Perf
Basic
Proficient
Advanced
Whitefish Bay / Whitefish Bay Mid
Grade 6
Students with Disabilities
15
0.0%
20.0%
6.7%
60.0%
13.3%
Students w/o Disabilities
178
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
17.4%
82.0%
Grade 7
Students with Disabilities
18
0.0%
5.6%
27.8%
50.0%
16.7%
Students w/o Disabilities
182
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
10.4%
87.9%
Grade 8
Students with Disabilities
11
0.0%
36.4%
27.3%
18.2%
18.2%
Students w/o Disabilities
199
0.5%
0.0%
3.0%
26.6%
69.8%
Table 4
WSAS - All Tested Grades - Reading
All Levels
WKCE and WAA Combined by English Proficiency
Burdick El FAY
November 2010 Data
Summary - All School Types Combined
Enrolled at Test Time
No WSAS Total
Min Perf
Basic
Proficient
Advanced
Milwaukee / Burdick El
Grade 3
Limited English Proficient
1
*
*
*
*
*
English Proficient
47
*
*
*
*
*
Grade 4
Limited English Proficient
1
*
*
*
*
*
English Proficient
34
*
*
*
*
*
Grade 5
Limited English Proficient
1
*
*
*
*
*
English Proficient
45
*
*
*
*
*
Grade 6
Limited English Proficient
0
NA
*
*
*
*
English Proficient
47
0.0%
4.3%
8.5%
53.2%
34.0%
Grade 7
Limited English Proficient
1
*
*
*
*
*
English Proficient
66
*
*
*
*
*
Grade 8
Limited English Proficient
2
*
*
*
*
*
English Proficient
46
*
*
*
*
Table 5
WSAS - All Tested Grades - Reading
All Levels
WKCE and WAA Combined by English Proficiency
Whitefish Bay Mid FAY
November 2010 Data
Summary - All School Types Combined
Enrolled at Test Time
No WSAS Total
Min Perf
Basic
Proficient
Advanced
Whitefish Bay / Whitefish Bay Mid
Grade 6
Limited English Proficient
3
*
*
*
*
*
English Proficient
190
*
*
*
*
*
Grade 7
Limited English Proficient
1
*
*
*
*
*
English Proficient
199
*
*
*
*
*
Grade 8
Limited English Proficient
4
*
*
*
*
*
English Proficient
206
*
*
*
*
*
Table 6
Phase 2
The demographic of students is different in every school. One area in which students differ from each other is family, students, and teacher relationships, students and teacher relationships. This can impact a school in several ways within the classroom. At Whitefish Bay Middle School the special education teacher made a comment that there are differences in race, religion, family dynamic, and socioeconomic status. The special education teacher also made an interesting point that she can’t assume anything. For example, she can’t assume that Billy will have a computer at home, just like Amy. It’s important for the teachers to get to know the students at the beginning of the year so that the teachers can be respectful to the students, family, and their beliefs. The speech pathologist at the school commented on the demographic of the school as well. The special education teacher also stated that the differences between family supports could have a disadvantage on students if the parents don’t know how to support the students at home with homework.
Assuming that all students’ family lifestyles are the same is not something that the speech pathologist or special education teacher does at Whitefish Bay Middle School. The special education teacher states, that each family dynamic is different, and adding a student with a disability can change the dynamic completely. They have learned not to generalize and approach every situation differently. Another form of knowledge gained from the students’ families is always keeping an open mind and being flexible. Each family needs different things, and when working with their child you have to make sure that you and the parent are on the same page. For example, if the student is not performing a certain behavior, the teacher needs to contact and discuss with the parents the next plan of actions. Most times, teachers won’t inform students parents until the end of the semester or when the students is kicked out of the school. At Whitefish Bay Middle School, they make sure that the parent-teacher relationship is strong and full of communication.
Students all achieve at different levels, but does gender, race, or ethnicity have anything to do with where they fall? The special education teacher made it clear that she works with lower academic performing students; she has all different types of students, but she maintains a high level of expectations from her students. The speech pathologist makes a note that some parents can afford for their children to do extra therapy sessions, classes, and experiences. For the students who don’t have this option, she makes a point to complete as much as possible during the time she has with them. In essence, I don’t believe race, gender, or ethnicity have anything to do with how students achieve in the class. It’s all about resources.
When it comes to background in cultural awareness, the programs at Whitefish Bay Middle School are fairly new. The special education teacher notes that the school has implanted workshops, seminars, and reading for teachers to become more culturally competent. The school also has to complete activities to enhance cultural awareness. In a school where the demographic is similar, it’s important for this school to reach beyond what they see and learn more from the world resources.
When it comes to 21st century learning, Whitefish Bay Middle School is established in technology. The classes are filled with technology; from SMART boards, Netbooks for each student, technology classes, Skype, teacher webpages, and students listening to their iPods while they work is just naming a few. In the special education rooms, students are using iPads and other assistive technology to communicate. Technology is available throughout the school in multiple facets. It is very important in today’s school to have these resources available. Students go home to their computers, iPods, televisions, and so much more. Schools need to be just as stimulating if not more.
Outreach services are available for the special education students if it is included in their IEP. Students can receive therapy, tutors, transportation, homebound teaching, and online lessons. However, because this is only the perspective from the special education teacher and speech pathologist, this doesn’t mean that regular education students don’t receive outreach services as well.
Culturally competence is imperative in a diverse school. In a day and age where bullies and “cliques” are becoming the norm, having the awareness that everyone is different is important. The special education teacher made an interesting point about Whitefish Bay Middle School. In essence, she implied that the school has not always been culturally competent, but it has grown since her six years at the school. She has witnessed the students’ ability to appreciate each other’s difference and truly accept each other.
Overall, Whitefish Bay Middle School addresses the cultural needs of all its students. They strive to be current and up to date with their teaching styles, technology, and resources for their students. When observers walk through the halls of the school, you can feel a sense of higher standard. The students are accepted to act and behave in a certain manner. Students at this school are given many opportunities to succeed in education. The way every student SHOULD be given.
Phase 3
Whitefish Bay Middle School is located in the Whitefish Bay district. This district is predominately Caucasian and upper middle class. This is a large contributor in the cultural proficiency, the achievement gap, and the parent involvement within the school. The state proficiency test results do not show enough information on the majority of the school ethnicity. However, it did reveal that students with Hispanic, African American, and Asian background placed above 50% in all grades tested.
In regards to the achievement gap, the gap is very low. There is about 50% or more students placing in the advanced or proficient level on the WKCE. However, this is just one look at the achievement in Whitefish Bay Middle School. The interviews conducted with the special education teacher and the speech pathologist confirmed a different outlook on the achievement gap. The special education teacher noted in a personal conversation that students coming in from the elementary schools struggle more than any other students involved in special education. The students are coming from an environment where the teachers and special education teachers wanted them to succeed. Which that they ended up hindering there learning. They always received second chances and more time on tests. Well, because of this, many students stopped studying for the test, knowing that they would get a second chance at it. In middle school, however this is not the case. Teachers are much stricter on how test are handled. Although the students IEP’s are being meet, the students cannot always bank on the “second chance theory.” The gap is not very large at this school, but there is evidence of a small one when it comes to the special education classroom.
Parents take their children’s education very seriously. Parents at Whitefish Bay Middle School are hands on and very involved. In an observation, I was able to witness parents drive students around to various locations to meet with a community contact on information the students were researching. The parents are also contacting teachers regularly. The special education teacher commented that she will have parents email here up to three times a week inquiring on their child’s behavior or education. Although, this is not the case for every parent or guardian, it is true for a majority of the school. You can sense the feeling of community and unity with a strong parent presence. This is important for the success of the student’s education.